A fork in the road

A Journey from Code to Culture

Technology captivated me from my earliest memories. While other kids played outside, I lived in digital worlds, forging friendships through screens and learning the intricate languages of computers. My online community became my sanctuary—though I’ll admit we occasionally pushed boundaries in ways that, looking back, could have led to serious trouble. I was fortunate to escape any lasting consequences from our digital adventures.

For years, I operated under a fundamental misconception: that technical prowess was the ultimate currency of success. I dismissed the humanities—literature, philosophy, history—as antiquated relics with little practical value. This was particularly ironic given that standardized tests and academic assessments consistently revealed these “soft” subjects as my greatest natural strengths. Yet I stubbornly clung to my belief that only code and algorithms mattered in the modern world.

Everything changed this past year. Personal trauma has a way of stripping away illusions and forcing you to confront fundamental questions about meaning, purpose, and what truly sustains us as human beings. In my darkest moments, I discovered that technical skills—however sophisticated—offered little comfort or guidance. It was the great works of literature, the wisdom of philosophers, and the lessons of history that provided the frameworks I needed to make sense of suffering and find a path forward.

This revelation prompted me to completely reconsider my educational trajectory. I applied to the University of Austin, drawn by its commitment to rigorous liberal arts education and its willingness to ask difficult questions about truth, beauty, and justice. When I received both admission and a full-ride scholarship, it felt like validation that this dramatic course correction was exactly what I needed.

The timing couldn’t be more perfect. The University of Austin’s unique position—with its connections to prominent figures in technology and venture capital—offers an unprecedented opportunity to bridge two worlds that are too often seen as incompatible. I envision leveraging these networks not just to advance my own career, but to build something meaningful that demonstrates how technical innovation can be guided by humanistic wisdom.

The stakes extend far beyond my personal journey. We’re living through a crisis of meaning and understanding that threatens the very foundations of our democratic society. When the majority of citizens cannot articulate the philosophical underpinnings of Western civilization—cannot explain why our institutions exist or how they might be improved—we become vulnerable to demagogues and simplistic solutions. Our founders understood that self-governance requires an educated citizenry capable of reasoned debate about complex moral and political questions. We abandon the liberal arts at our civilizational peril.

My mission for the next four years is ambitious yet essential: to forge a synthesis between humanistic wisdom and technological capability. I want to emerge not just as a more skilled programmer or entrepreneur, but as someone who can think deeply about the human implications of the tools we build. In a world increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence and digital systems, we desperately need technologists who understand literature, philosophy, and history—who can ask not just “can we build this?” but “should we build this?” and “what kind of world will this create?”

This integration won’t be easy, but I believe it’s exactly what our moment demands: a new generation of builders who are equally fluent in Python and Plato, who can debug code and deconstruct arguments, who understand both algorithms and ethics. The future belongs not to narrow specialists, but to those who can navigate complexity with both technical precision and moral clarity.

Big Companies Don't Give a Damn About You

Why Big Tech Companies Don’t Give a Damn About You

The Baidu Wake-Up Call

I stumbled across this brutal Twitter rant that perfectly captures the rage every tech user feels but rarely articulates:

“Why hasn’t a big company like Baidu, with a product like Baidu Cloud that has so many users, bothered to adapt it for high-resolution screens? It’s like they’re force-feeding users crap; every time I open it, it’s disgusting.”

Disgusting. That’s the word that cuts to the bone here. Not “suboptimal” or “needs improvement”—disgusting.

And you know what? They’re absolutely right.

The Brutal Economics of User Contempt

Here’s the uncomfortable truth that every product manager knows but will never admit publicly: domestic tech giants don’t need to care about user experience.

Their competitive advantage isn’t built on delighting customers—it’s built on creating dependency through market dominance and ecosystem lock-in. Once they’ve got you trapped in their walled garden, they can serve you garbage on a silver platter and you’ll keep eating it.

The Cost-Benefit Calculus of Contempt

Let’s do the math that keeps executives awake at night:

  • Option A: Deploy several developers and designers for months to fix high-DPI support
  • Option B: Launch a quick marketing campaign that drives immediate revenue

Guess which one wins every single time?

The harsh reality is that polishing the user interface generates zero measurable revenue compared to aggressive user acquisition tactics. In fact, it often shows up as negative ROI on quarterly reports—the kiss of death in corporate boardrooms.

But here’s the part that should make us all furious: this reflects our collective failure as consumers. Domestic users have been systematically trained to accept mediocrity. We complain, we rant on social media, but we keep using the damn products anyway.

Exhibit B: DJI’s Calculated Indifference

The DJI Pocket case study reveals just how surgically precise this contempt can be.

I remember that forum post about the absolute nightmare of transferring files from the DJI Pocket. Anyone who’s tried to move footage off that device knows the pain—it’s like the engineers actively tried to make it as frustrating as possible.

That post exploded with engagement. Hardcore vloggers and NAS enthusiasts—people who actually understand workflow optimization—flooded the comments with detailed, actionable suggestions. These weren’t casual users whining about minor inconveniences; these were power users offering free consulting on how to fix a genuinely broken experience.

Two Years of Silence

DJI’s response after two years? Complete radio silence.

Not a single employee acknowledgment. Not even a form letter saying “thanks for the feedback.” Just the corporate equivalent of a middle finger.

Why? Because DJI’s spreadsheet warriors ran the numbers and realized that optimizing file transfer workflows would help maybe 5% of their user base become marginally more productive. The other 95%—the Instagram weekend warriors who shoot 30-second clips—couldn’t care less about efficient batch transfers.

The Pocket’s core competitiveness has nothing to do with respecting power users’ time. It’s about being small, affordable, and producing decent footage for social media. Everything else is noise.

The Capital Market Reality Check

Here’s what the motivational business books won’t tell you:

  • “Big company” ≠ User-friendly products
  • “Millions of users” ≠ Caring about individual experience
  • “Market dominance” ≠ Quality improvement incentives

That’s not how capital markets work, and it’s not how they’re designed to work.

Public companies exist to maximize shareholder value, period. User experience improvements only matter insofar as they drive measurable revenue growth or prevent churn. If you’re already locked into their ecosystem and complaining but not leaving, you’re essentially subsidizing their indifference.

The Uncomfortable Truth

We’re not customers—we’re revenue units in a spreadsheet. And until we start acting like customers who actually have alternatives and use them, nothing will change.

The rant about Baidu Cloud isn’t really about high-DPI support. It’s about a fundamental disrespect for users’ time, intelligence, and dignity. And the most infuriating part?

They’re getting away with it because we let them.

Essays

Why would I write essays? To give voice to my thoughts and ideas.